tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3615332969083650973.post1985540512892842640..comments2024-03-23T07:59:04.047-04:00Comments on sysadvent: Day 5 - Storage Availability: DRBDJordan Sisselhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13694925032675599790noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3615332969083650973.post-42932841223579312302009-12-23T17:53:32.213-05:002009-12-23T17:53:32.213-05:00drbd could be good for lower writing loads. Forget...drbd could be good for lower writing loads. Forget dumb ideas like put-your-db-on-it. Don't believe who said it's cool with a smart smile. They don't know what they are talking about.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3615332969083650973.post-9757908511480132702009-12-08T08:10:16.017-05:002009-12-08T08:10:16.017-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3615332969083650973.post-88911318459959870842009-12-07T11:42:37.766-05:002009-12-07T11:42:37.766-05:00Anon: it scales only to a few nodes, but most ofte...Anon: it scales only to a few nodes, but most often people will run HA-iSCSI between two nodes, and let their 100 nodes access the iSCSI target. Other designs include 100 pairs of servers, each redundant and replicated. The possibilities are endless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3615332969083650973.post-76304115619500022712009-12-05T15:29:14.597-05:002009-12-05T15:29:14.597-05:00I think DRBD is excellent for small-scale solution...I think DRBD is excellent for small-scale solution. I wasn't sure if it is possible to scale in a large environment though, in cases like you have 100 machines making up a single logical storage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com